Here’s a list of engines run on a single Hans game:ĮngineUnknown=0? were end game with no other engine showing best move. In other words, amateur sleuths have run a million engines on Hans games and now the fact that a million engines have been run on those games constitutes evidence that Hans cheated. Furthermore, a game’s engine correlation score can increase over time as more and more crowdsourced analysis is added to that game, but can never decrease.įood for thought: which player in recent times has come under intense scrutiny, and consequently, has had their games intensely analyzed like no other by a wide gamut of engines? What this means is, the more attention a game gets, the higher its engine correlation is going to be by virtue of more available analyses/engines to match. For the Let’s Check feature in ChessBase, the pool of engines used is literally just based on crowdsourced compute from all engine analyses ever run on a particular game. This is a key point that few people seem to grasp. The Redditor spells out the obvious implications here: And critically, it ALWAYS uses suggestions from ALL the engines on file, you don’t get to choose. A move is deemed to have engine correlation if it matches the suggestion of any engine, and those engine suggestions are crowdsourced on ChessBase from all the engines users have ever run on the position. Lol someone on Reddit posted about how “engine correlation” on ChessBase’s Let’s Check feature works and it’s dumber than I could possibly have imagined.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |